mns2012 (mns2012) wrote in biosemiotics,

Цитируем специалистов: о связи биологии и лингвистики

Подтверждение основной моей тезы о том, что биология тесно связана с лингвистикой.

Genomes appear similar to natural language texts, and protein domains can be treated as analogs of words. To investigate the linguistic properties of genomes further, we calculated the complexity of the “protein languages” in all major branches of life and identified a nearly universal value of information gain associated with the transition from a random domain arrangement to the current protein domain architecture. An exploration of the evolutionary relationship of the protein languages identified the domain combinations that discriminate between the major branches of cellular life. We conclude that there exists a “quasi-universal grammar” of protein domains and that the nearly constant information gain we identified corresponds to the minimal complexity required to maintain a functional cell.

Lijia Yu, Deepak Kumar Tanwar, Emanuel Diego S. Penha, Yuri I. Wolf, Eugene V. Koonin, and Malay Kumar Basu: Grammar of Protein Domain Architecture, PNAS.

Из абстракта:

From an abstract, informational perspective, protein domains appear analogous to words in natural languages in which the rules of word association are dictated by linguistic rules, or grammar. Such rules exist for protein domains as well, because only a small fraction of all possible domain combinations is viable in evolution. We employ a popular linguistic technique, n-gram analysis, to probe the “proteome grammar”—that is, the rules of association of domains that generate various domain architectures of proteins. Comparison of the complexity measures of “protein languages” in major branches of life shows that the relative entropy difference (information gain) between the observed domain architectures and random domain combinations is highly conserved in evolution and is close to being a universal constant, at ∼1.2 bits. Substantial deviations from this constant are observed in only two major groups of organisms: a subset of Archaea that appears to be cells simplified to the limit, and animals that display extreme complexity. We also identify the n-grams that represent signatures of the major branches of cellular life. The results of this analysis bolster the analogy between genomes and natural language and show that a “quasi-universal grammar” underlies the evolution of domain architectures in all divisions of cellular life. The nearly universal value of information gain by the domain architectures could reflect the minimum complexity of signal processing that is required to maintain a functioning cell.

Это хорошо, что один из авторов -- Кунин. Кто вздумает ругать, будет ругать самого Кунина, авось поостережётся )) Вот этим-то и ценны хорошие статьи, что хочешь-не хочешь, а объективная реальность вылезает сама собой.

Ну, и в заключение: рекомендую на те же самые результаты посмотреть, заменив слово evolution на слово design, чтобы, так сказать, добавить выводам реализма. И будет совсем хорошо.
Tags: биология, биосемиозис, лингвистика живого, лингвистические машины, цитата

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic